Evansville City Council heard Monday that automatic license plate readers had never been found to violate the Fourth Amendment. They have.

A federal judge ruled a warrantless search of a month of vehicle records violated the Fourth Amendment. Here is what the decision means for Texas.

A federal judge has ruled that a Tulsa County sheriff’s deputy violated the Fourth Amendment when he used Flock license plate reader technology to access weeks of a driver’s travel history, warning ...

The case arose from a 2019 robbery of a credit union. Witnesses and surveillance footage could not identify the robber, but the evidence showed that he approached from the direction of a nearby church ...

Seven years ago, police in Midlothian, Virginia, sought to identify a bank robber by asking Google to search the records of more than 500 million people who used the company's "location history" ...

Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. In Big Win for Fourth Amendment Advocates, the Supreme Court Says 'Geofence Warrants' Count as a 'Search' The U.S. Supreme Court ...

A federal judge in Oklahoma suppressed evidence in a drug trafficking case, determining that law enforcement violated the Fourth Amendment by using automated license plate reader technology to track ...

The Fourth Amendment is the part of the Bill of Rights that prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures." But — what's unreasonable? That... The 4th Amendment: Search and Seizure The 4th Amendment: ...

Justice Samuel Alito issued a pointed dissent after the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that police conducted a Fourth Amendment search when they obtained a Virginia robbery suspect’s cellphone location data ...